This is a representative example of the report users will receive after an evaluation run completes. It uses demo data but renders the actual report interface and tabs (Summary, Benchmarks, Discovery, Findings, and History).
Sample run ID: sample-run-2026-02-24-axo-001
Overall
72.36
Accessibility
74.6
Discovery
69
Providers
3
Status
completed
Agents can usually complete the requested commerce flow, but they waste time on account-first patterns and ambiguous checkout validation copy. The biggest improvement opportunity is reducing avoidable retries during checkout entry and form correction. Overall, the site is usable for agents today, but not yet consistently efficient across providers.
The crawl-based AEO audit scored 71/100 across 6 pages. Strong areas include open graph basics, internal linking, and indexable for discovery. The biggest gaps are structured data present, llms.txt valid, and content structure. 1 page required browser fallback because HTTP HTML looked JS-rendered or too sparse.
Shared friction points, repeated strengths, and notable differences across the provider runs.
Higher agreement means provider accessibility scores are more closely aligned.
Top 3 highest-priority fixes from this run.
/cart, /checkout, "Continue as guest"
Overview
OpenAI and Gemini both retried account-first paths before they found the guest checkout route.
Recommended Fix
Move 'Continue as guest' above sign-in and make it a primary CTA on cart and checkout entry.
/checkout, "Phone", "State / Province"
Overview
Providers hit validation errors on checkout fields and had to infer the expected format from trial and error.
Recommended Fix
Add inline examples for phone, state/province, and postal fields and preserve entered values after a validation error.
/, /build
Overview
Only 1/6 pages exposed structured data in the crawl.
Recommended Fix
Add valid JSON-LD on your key templates and choose the schema.org type that matches each page.
